Andy Mano on texts what you know

User talk: Ricardalovesmonuments

- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 03:58, 20 April 2018 (UTC)

Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File: F. Solimena Ob. Belvedere.jpg [edit]

                              +/−
This file may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File: F. Solimena Ob. Belvedere.jpg, is a derivative work containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.

While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright.

Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!
 

Ronhjones (Talk) 14:40, 13 May 2018 (UTC)

Why do you mean with every photo I take of a painting in a Viennese museum or building that I copy or derive it from somewhere? !!? - Ricardalovesmonuments (talk) 15:05, 13 May 2018 (UTC)

Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File: Oberes Belvedere - 3.jpg [edit]

                              +/−
This file may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File: Upper Belvedere - 3.jpg, is a derivative work containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.

While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright.

Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!
 

Ronhjones (Talk) 14:48, 13 May 2018 (UTC)

This is not a derivative work, I myself photographed the ceiling picture of a Belvedere hall, so I do not understand your excitement about the picture and the threat of file deletion --Ricardalovesmonuments (talk) 15:02, 13 May 2018 (UTC)

File: Upper Belvedere - 4.jpg [edit]

Hello Ricardalovesmonuments, I can't make sense of the description. Where is the model of the Upper Belvedere? Do you have a photo where you can read the manufacturer and the date? lg --Herzi Pinki (talk) 21:14, 13 May 2018 (UTC)

No, I don't have an extra photo of it because I thought it wasn't necessary as it is part of the permanent exhibition about the history of the house .-- Ricardalovesmonuments (talk) 03:49, 14 May 2018 (UTC)
It should be about Franz Hnizdo. lg --Herzi Pinki (talk) 06:50, 14 May 2018 (UTC)

File: Argentinierstrasse - 1.jpg [edit]

Image is mirrored, please mirror. Argentinierstraße 57. Can you please check how this can happen and whether this is also the case with other pictures. lg --Herzi Pinki (talk) 21:47, 13 May 2018 (UTC)

I took the picture with the selfie function from the mobile phone (held the mobile phone on the opposite wall and pulled the trigger), otherwise I would not have got the whole house on it. I still photographed the hall in the Lower Belvedere - Ricardalovesmonuments (talk) 03:45, 14 May 2018 (UTC)
OK thanks. But since you are not on it, there is no reason for the mirroring. And it is not encyclopedic to represent reality mirrored without reference. Can you please mirror the two pictures and upload them again as a new version? lg --Herzi Pinki (talk) 06:58, 14 May 2018 (UTC)
Thanks. As a new version ... With every picture you have under File versions the menu item Upload a new version of this file. This overwrites the old version and does not need to be deleted. lg --Herzi Pinki (talk) 11:48, 14 May 2018 (UTC)

File: Argentinierstrasse - 1.jpg [edit]

Herzi Pinki (talk) 11:40, 14 May 2018 (UTC)

File: Lower Belvedere - 3.jpg [edit]

Herzi Pinki (talk) 11:45, 14 May 2018 (UTC)

wrong filenames [edit]

can be corrected, dear Ricardalovesmonuments. It is not necessary to upload the file again in the event of typing errors. Instructions for renaming can be found under Commons: File renaming. All in all, this is the simplest procedure for everyone involved. For the files that have now been uploaded twice by the Fransiskanerkirche, I provide a LA / DR. Lg --Herzi Pinki (talk) 17:23, 15 May 2018 (UTC)

I didn't upload the Franziskaner pictures twice, the mobile phone was self-sufficient (probably as a result of the fact that I plugged it in 25 minutes ago to charge it - Ricardalovesmonuments (talk) 17:41, 15 May 2018 (UTC)

Please delete file: François Clouet .jpg

With a colon in front of the file, the image is not included. LA posed. So, so the cell phone. :-) Technology is a dog, greetings also on the cell phone. My service is actually limited to categorization, not identification. I have now identified a few of your KHM pictures / undefined, but when you stand in front of them the pictures are usually labeled in museums, that would be firstly easier and secondly the original title according to KHM. (And thirdly your task?) Lg --Herzi Pinki (talk)

Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File: Maria am Gestade - 10.jpg [edit]

                              +/−
This file may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File: Maria am Gestade - 10.jpg, is a derivative work containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.

While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright.

Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!
 

Ronhjones (Talk) 20:35, 17 May 2018 (UTC)

File: Gardegasse 8.jpg [edit]

This is not a good name, I'm afraid ... You should describe the city first, f.e. "File: Bern, Gardegasse 8" Wieralee (talk) 16:17, 18 May 2018 (UTC)

or "File: Vienna, Gardegasse 8", maybe? Once the stuff is categorized, file names matter less. --Herzi Pinki (talk) 19:53, 18 May 2018 (UTC)

Fill in [edit]

Sorry, but I have to put it on. I don't think it's OK what you're doing here. Imagine someone throws hundreds of snapshots into your photo album every day - without any description, classification, etc. By the way, you seriously believe that a snapshot like this is needed for encyclopedic purposes, unless someone is looking for a photo, where a palace is distorted and only partially photographed, including a silver car and an advertising board that obscures the view? Bwag (talk) 16:42, 18 May 2018 (UTC)

Have you already been to the Palais Auersperg? Do you even know that it is impossible to take pictures of the palace as a whole, if at all between December and the beginning of March, when the trees do not have leaves that block the view? - Ricardalovesmonuments (talk) 17:01, 18 May 2018 (UTC) The majority of buildings cannot be photographed in any other way than I did. In addition, I only take photos of buildings with an encyclopedic aspect anyway .-- Ricardalovesmonuments (talk) 17:37, 18 May 2018 (UTC)
In addition, what can I do to ensure that I can get there in a few days of vacation for what others need Many months to photograph the historical buildings (before 1914) of every Viennese cadastral community? Instead of Wikimedia being thankful to me, you put me down - Ricardalovesmonuments (talk) 18:21, 18 May 2018 (UTC)
Bwag was obviously already at the Auersperg, even in May, with a pole and no foreground noises. What makes your accusations baseless. And the thanks of the WP are heterogeneous, those who look at the number of pictures are of course happy, those who process and look through the pictures and possibly want to use them are less. Of course, such images as the one quoted by Bwag are not of any benefit to the WP. lg --Herzi Pinki (talk) 20:01, 18 May 2018 (UTC)

Because of the pole and no front noises: firstly, I don't have a (selfie) pole, secondly, I was happy if I caught a moment without a tram coming into my picture (not to mention cars, thirdly, I tried everything To reduce this as much as possible if trucks or vans have blocked the motif on my side of the street, not to mention the permanent weekly market in the narrow street in Neubau .-- Ricardalovesmonuments (talk) 21:34, 18 May 2018 (UTC)

PLEASE DELETE [edit]

Hello Ricardalovesmonuments, to [1], that doesn't work reliably and probably only because I'm busy with your pictures. It would be better if you would make a deletion request on the file. You can find the request for deletion on the left under Suggest deletion, but in the present case it is better to use the {{Duplicate}} or {{Speedy}} templates. I have now put it in my bag for the specific picture, and as I said, pictures can be renamed. lg --Herzi Pinki (talk) 09:07, 19 May 2018 (UTC)

Do you know that? [Edit]

https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:F%C3%B6rderung/Reisekostenerstattungen. Maybe this will be useful for you next time. lg --Herzi Pinki (talk) 09:42, 19 May 2018 (UTC)

Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File: Hermesvilla Sissi-Portrait Hermann Nigg 1882.jpg [edit]

                              +/−
This file may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File: Hermesvilla Sissi-Portrait Hermann Nigg 1882.jpg, is a derivative work containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.

While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright.

Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!
 

D Y O L F 77[Talk] 20:43, 22 May 2018 (UTC)